11/7/05 03:29 pm - Things Aren't Great for Bart Right Now
-Bart
![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
This Father's Day was very interesting for me. Besides being my first Father's Day where I actually am a father (something daunting in and of itself), but because I reflected on something someone had mentioned to me in passing that I hadn't thought much of until Father's Day.
Being a parent is an important job.
That may be obvious to the vast majority of people, but it wasn't to me. The other thing I realized during my considerations was that I've never before had an important job before in my entire life. Everything I've done until we got these kids was of middling importance at most, and most things I've done were of no importance or even of negative importance. Now, I actually have a responsibility that matters.
Kinda strange really.
Rather than look at Father's Day as a day to pat myself on the back, I'm going to look at it as my day to make resolutions on how to be a better father to my kids. They deserve a far better one than had them before me, and deserve one better than I am as well. They're good kids and they try very hard to do the right thing.
While I had vowed to myself to make this a purely political blog, I'm throwing this out there as well. I think I'm going to have to make a separate blog for my political stuff. This one is already too burdened with my personal life to make it anything else.
So...here are my resolutions:
There it is.
Bartleby
The Moynihan Institute quotes Charles Ogletree thus:
"The purpose of reparations is to bludgeon white Americans into further guilt over slavery and racial segregation and thereby soften them up for a continuing river of financial swag far into the future. Like Martin Luther King Day, Black History Month, the war on Confederate iconography and the crusade against major heroes and symbols of American history and culture, the reparations boondoggle is simply one more part of the continuing political race war that blacks are determined to wage against whites."
Reparations - let's see...the last slave was owned some time back in the 1800's. If any former slave from the antebellum south is alive today, I'll eat my hat. So...how in the world do I, who had no relatives who ever owned slaves (sorry, but they were in Ireland at the time) owe a SINGLE PENNY to these people who were never enslaved in the first place?
I hereby grant that they were enslaved by others, and that those specific people that enslaved them and performed the original enslavement are liable for their reparations. In many (maybe most?) cases, this was their opponent tribes in Africa. So, the reparations for those people that were enslaved by their neighbors in Africa should come from the (now dead) people that enslaved them. Mind you, I still think only people directly effected by enslavement (the slaves and their immediate descendents) should receive any monies for this...so if any immediate descendent of a slave is alive today, and they can find the person that originally enslaved their first enslaved ancestor, they have the right to ask for reparations from said person.
Otherwise, I'd say Prof. Ogletree is right.
By the way, he happens to be black.
Bartleby
OK - I've got to rant again...
Partial Birth Abortion...why is this legal again? This is behavior that if it were done to PUPPIES, the person doing it would be in prison for cruelty to animals, but it's A-OK to do it to a baby! Wait...how does that work again? It's OK to do to a baby, but if you jammed seven inch scissors into a 90% birthed puppy's skull, you'd go to prison?
Description (and images) of a PBA:

1. They initiate contractions
2. The baby, in response to the contractions, grows more active
3. The baby is slowly pulled out with forceps in a deliberate breech birth
4. Once all but the baby's head is out of the birth canal (were it not sedated, its legs would be kicking at this point), they take seven inch long scissors and jam them into the skull of the baby, murdering it.
Somehow this is not murder. Somehow this is worse if done to a dog. Somehow...people view this as the exercise of a right! This can be done by a child without parents being notified, regardless of the age of the child! These kids cannot get prescription COLD MEDICINE without parental consent, but they can deliver a baby and have it killed without the parents ever being informed! THIS IS RIDICULOUS!
Bartleby
Rant about an old drug but that pertains to an existing (and I think critical) problem. Fen-Phen and drugs in particular:
FenPhen caused (as the huge problem) primary pulminary hypertension (see the Condi article above). It changed the risks of getting it radically and actually made the chances go up by several hundred percent. That means that out of the people who took FenPhen, one person in several million would get PPH.
The second, smaller problem that FenPhen caused was cardiac valvular dysfunction.
How many people out of the millions in the USA that took FenPhen got CVD?
The FDA had reports of a total of 85.
The mean time the people took FenPhen in the FDA study? 11.9 months.
The time recommended to take FenPhen (by the manufacturer)? 6 weeks (this part is from memory folks, it may have been 6 months).
http://www.fda.gov/cder/news/slides/
So - who was at fault here? Was it the FDA, who signed off on the drug as being safe? Was it the doctor who continued prescribing the drugs far beyond the time range specified by the manufacturer and recommended in medical literature? Was it the pharmacist, who saw people using the drugs far beyond the range recommended in the medical literature? Was it the users, who used the drugs far beyond the time range specified by the manufacturer and recommended in medical literature?
The feds, the voters, the users of the drugs, and the medical personnel...who continue to complain about the high cost of drugs...decided it was the fault of...THE DRUG COMPANY!
The drug company...that spent considerable time, effort, and expense to find a safe usage range of the drug and issued strict recommendations of usage...THEY were the ones at fault. This despite the fact that their instructions for use were repeatedly ignored. This despite the fact that they followed the FDA's instructions for testing and compliance for sale within the ever-stringent USA. This despite the fact that people in europe who had used the drug for years as recommended by the manufacturer had no problems.
The likelyhood of this actually being because the drug company was at fault is pretty freaking slim. The likelyhood of this being because the drug company has a lot of money is huge.
Bartleby
There's a discussion on Vox Populi's blog about public breast feeding. The argument is over whether or not it's courteous to openly breastfeed in public, rather than being discreet and either use a blanket to make it more private or to go to a more private location to keep it out of everyone's face.
My perspective? Simple - keep it out of our faces, don't make me answer questions my kids shouldn't have to ask, and be polite.
Why is it that so many people lack so much of basic courtesy. I don't care if you do it, but don't be obvious about it, please. I don't cut my toenails in the restaurant, please don't expose your breasts similarly.
Bartleby